Brad Edwards
Brad Edwards is a Fort Lauderdale plaintiffs' attorney who represented Epstein victims in the federal CVRA case alongside Paul Cassell, while simultaneously maintaining a direct personal correspondence with Epstein that produced his own defamation settlement and placed him as a communications conduit between Epstein and Boies Schiller Flexner during the Sarah Ransome settlement negotiations in late 2018.
Brad Edwards is a Fort Lauderdale, Florida plaintiffs' attorney and Board Certified Trial Lawyer who represented Epstein victims in the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) federal case in the Southern District of Florida, working as co-counsel alongside University of Utah law professor Paul Cassell. Edwards maintained a direct personal email correspondence with Jeffrey Epstein from at least 2015 through February 2019 — spanning the same period during which he served as lead advocate for Epstein's victims in the CVRA proceedings. That correspondence, preserved in the DOJ-released document corpus and cited under EFTA reference numbers, documents regular phone contacts, in-person breakfast meetings in Palm Beach and Fort Lauderdale, a personal wager over Bill Clinton flight logs (EFTA02481057), and direct exchanges about strategic litigation matters affecting both Epstein and his accusers 1, 2.
Review of the email record indicates Edwards occupied three distinct roles simultaneously in late 2018 through early 2019: (1) adversary to Epstein as victims' counsel in ongoing CVRA litigation; (2) negotiating party in his own defamation settlement with Epstein, which concluded in December 2018 with a written public apology from Epstein acknowledging his lawsuit had been "my unreasonable attempt to damage Edwards's business reputation"; and (3) intermediary who facilitated direct email contact between Epstein and David Boies of Boies Schiller Flexner for purposes of settling the Sarah Ransome (Jane Doe 43) SDNY case (17-cv-00616), which terminated December 26, 2018 3, 4. Following settlement, Epstein directed a donation from his Enhanced Education foundation trade name — confirmed via FedEx delivery from the St. Thomas USVI address — to the National Crime Victim Bar Association at Edwards's written request, dated January 24, 2019 (EFTA02626876) 5.
Legal Proceedings
Edwards first appears in Epstein litigation as co-counsel with Paul Cassell in the CVRA federal case seeking to void the 2008 non-prosecution agreement in the Southern District of Florida. That litigation, which produced a 2019 ruling finding the NPA was negotiated in violation of the CVRA, continued through the period during which Edwards was also negotiating personally with Epstein.
In parallel, Epstein filed a defamation suit against Edwards. The civil litigation general file (GRM Box #004740716) confirms a Florida Bar complaint against Edwards was also active during this period, alongside focus group materials and AIG insurance defense requests reflecting Epstein's legal counter-strategy against the victims' counsel. The defamation case was resolved by direct bilateral negotiation between Edwards and Epstein, conducted without lawyers — Edwards's own phrase in the emails was "Without lawyers, we can get things done. Impossible once you bring in the opinions of a bunch of lawyers" (EFTA02614384). Epstein's lawyer Martin Weinberg ("Marty") objected to the apology language on grounds it could constitute an "admission of a crime," and Epstein sought modifications to protect a separate suit against Fowler White Burnett. Analysis of the correspondence indicates the final settlement, completed December 2018, included: (a) a public written apology from Epstein, (b) payment of Edwards's legal costs, and (c) Epstein's agreement to donate to the National Crime Victim Bar Association at Edwards's direction 4.
The Dershowitz defamation track runs as a separate but intersecting thread. In October 2015, Epstein served as direct intermediary between Edwards and Alan Dershowitz, who were engaged in defamation litigation against each other stemming from Dershowitz's public statements about Epstein victims. Epstein's emails document him relaying settlement offers: "would you guys take 200k each from the offer of settlement from dersh?" and later "the deal on the table is 1 million dollars split between you three. or 1 million given to the charities of your choices... alan thinks the charity is better so as not to look like money is going into each others pockets" (EFTA02487391, EFTA02485300). By October 9, 2015, Edwards was reporting to Epstein that Dershowitz had "agreed to the settlement and to agree to a joint public statement" (EFTA02484887). Review of the records indicates that the structural position this created — Epstein acting as go-between for his victims' lawyer and his former defense counsel, in litigation those two parties were conducting against each other — has no documented precedent in the corpus 6.
The Sarah Ransome backchannel role is the third distinct legal track. Epstein's November 13, 2018 email to Edwards explicitly thanked him for "the david call" — referring to David Boies — after Edwards made the introduction that opened direct settlement discussions in SDNY 17-cv-00616 (EFTA02614962). Edwards's facilitation of that connection occurred in the same weeks he was negotiating his own settlement with Epstein. According to the correspondence, by December 12, 2018, Epstein informed Kathy Ruemmler the Ransome case was "settled ransome" (EFTA02610455); the case terminated December 26, 2018 3.
Key Relationships
Jeffrey Epstein — The relationship with Jeffrey Epstein was formally adversarial but operationally personal. Regular phone-date scheduling, in-person breakfast meetings in Palm Beach and Fort Lauderdale, personal wagers, and the exchange of confidential litigation communications directly between the parties (not through counsel) characterize the documented correspondence. Epstein told Edwards, "you and I get along better than others" (EFTA02614488). The email record spans the October 2015 Dershowitz mediation through the February 2019 Enhanced Education donation request, a period of more than three years during which Edwards simultaneously pursued victims' claims against Epstein. Analysis of the records suggests the defamation settlement's financial component — Epstein directing a donation from his foundation to a victim advocacy organization at Edwards's personal written request — documents a continuing financial relationship post-settlement 2, 5.
David Boies — Edwards served as the introduction point connecting Epstein directly to David Boies (Boies Schiller Flexner) for purposes of negotiating the Sarah Ransome SDNY settlement in November 2018. The independent significance of this role derives from timing: Edwards was simultaneously negotiating his own settlement with Epstein when he facilitated the Epstein-Boies channel. Boies's own communications in the corpus show him corresponding with Epstein directly about Ransome settlement terms through late November and December 2018, following Edwards's introduction (EFTA02613626, EFTA02614358). Separately, records indicate Boies's relationship with Epstein's network extended to the Virginia Roberts/Giuffre litigation and Boies's own reputational positioning around Epstein disclosures — Epstein questioned whether Boies "would put himself so out there if he knew he had been scammed by virginia" 3.
Sarah Ransome — Edwards's documented connection to Sarah Ransome (Jane Doe 43, plaintiff in SDNY 17-cv-00616) is indirect and structural: Edwards was not Ransome's attorney of record in that case, but he served as the conduit through which Ransome's opposing party (Epstein) established direct contact with Ransome's attorney (Boies) to negotiate her settlement. The case terminated December 26, 2018, eight days after Epstein confirmed to Ruemmler that it was settled. Review of the records indicates no evidence that Edwards had any representation agreement with Ransome or that Ransome's counsel was informed of his simultaneous personal settlement negotiations with Epstein Connection #249, 3.
Enhanced Education — The Enhanced Education trade name of J. Epstein Virgin Islands Foundation Inc. (USVI trade name TN0002420, same Red Hook Quarter B3 address as STC and other Epstein entities) was the disbursement vehicle for the January-February 2019 donation to the National Crime Victim Bar Association at Edwards's request. Epstein confirmed by email on February 1, 2019 that a check had been "put on the jan giving list" and dispatched by FedEx from Enhanced Education (EFTA02628571). This placed Epstein's charitable foundation — which also disbursed funds to universities, arts organizations, and personal recipients — in a direct financial relationship with the advocacy organization representing the class of people Edwards was suing Epstein on behalf of 5.
Brad Edwards
All Connections
3 total
All Connections
3 total All Findings
6 total
All Findings
6 totalfinancial (1)
Feb 1, 2019: Epstein personally emailed Brad Edwards confirming a check FedExed from Enhanced Education. Edwards had requested on Jan 24, 2019 a 'foundation donation' to National Crime Victim Bar Association (3434 North Washington Blvd, Suite 1100, Arlington VA 22201). Epstein confirmed it was 'put on the jan giving list' and 'actually gets sent today.' Same day Epstein also sent separate email confirming FedEx delivery from Enhanced Education. This is Epstein's foundation paying for a donation to a victim advocacy organization at the request of Edwards, the attorney who represented Epstein's victims and had settled with Epstein in Dec 2018.
relationship (1)
Edwards and Epstein had a personal bet about Bill Clinton flight logs. Edwards claimed Clinton traveled on Epstein plane while VR traveled to Thailand. This social betting between victim attorney and perpetrator shows extraordinary comfort level.
legal (4)
Epstein and Brad Edwards had extensive personal relationship: regular phone dates, breakfast meetings in Palm Beach/Fort Lauderdale, 'our deal' discussions (Oct 2015), bets about Clinton flight logs, and referencing 'Dersh' (Dershowitz). Edwards connected Epstein with David Boies for 'ransome' discussions (Nov 2018). Edwards settled his defamation suit against Epstein in Dec 2018 with public apology. By Jan-Feb 2019, Edwards was requesting Epstein fund donations to National Crime Victim Bar Association through Enhanced Education - suggesting terms of settlement may have included ongoing financial relationship.
In Oct 2015, Epstein brokered settlement negotiations between Edwards/Cassell (victims' attorneys) and Dershowitz. 'Our deal' in EFTA02710692 refers to the Dershowitz settlement. Epstein offered Edwards: 'would you guys take 200k each from the offer of settlement from dersh?' Later: 'the deal on the table is 1 million dollars split between you three. or 1 million given to the charities of your choices... alan thinks the charity is better so as not to look like money is going into each others pockets.' This is ethically extraordinary: the perpetrator mediating between his victims' lawyer and his former defense counsel (Dershowitz), who were in defamation litigation against each other.
Edwards served as Epstein's backchannel to David Boies (Boies Schiller Flexner) to negotiate the Sarah Ransome (Jane Doe 43) settlement in Nov-Dec 2018, while simultaneously negotiating his own defamation settlement with Epstein. Edwards connected Epstein directly with Boies via email Nov 20, 2018. 'ransome' in the emails refers to Sarah Ransome, plaintiff in SDNY 17-cv-00616. Case terminated Dec 26, 2018. Epstein told Ruemmler 'settled ransome' on Dec 12, 2018.
Edwards and Epstein negotiated directly without lawyers, with a remarkably collegial tone. Edwards: 'Without lawyers, we can get things done. Impossible once you bring in the opinions of a bunch of lawyers.' Epstein to Edwards: 'you and I get along better than others.' The settlement included: (1) a public apology from Epstein admitting his lawsuit was 'my unreasonable attempt to damage Edwards's business reputation,' (2) payment of Edwards's legal costs, and (3) Epstein's donation to National Crime Victim Bar Association at Edwards's request (Jan-Feb 2019). Epstein's lawyer Martin Weinberg ('Marty') objected that apology language could constitute 'admission of a crime.' Epstein sought to modify 'absolutely false allegations' to protect a separate case against Fowler White Burnett.